Embedded - supported or not?

[ReneMiner]

...

Probably merits a thread of its own.
...

Probably not. Even we obtained our decimal system and the digits from arab roots and they have great mathematicians - the Ring lacks impermeableness, not really codetight and it feels a bit strange to use a verb as "see" as command to print.
If "show" were used instead it would make sense. The arab phrase for "Look at that!" might be the same as "Let me show you this..." or "Do you see it?"
Especially i see - when i watch my taskmanager -
multithreading out of control -
before actually a second thread is invoked 3 or 4 threads already yall'a-yall'a and nothing that could pull the brakes

[primo]

Thank you ReneMiner for referring to Ring language. i am still testing it.
we can use the classic "print" by loading first "stdlib.ring" this is like uses "console"

load "stdlib.ring"
print("hello worlds")

or we can use "?" without loading stdlib.ring
regrading the keywords : see,give,ok and so on we can use the function ChangeRingKeyword
such as
ChangeRingKeyword see throw
will use throw for output
and
ChangeRingKeyword ok EndOfConditional
will use EndOfConditional for end of condition
some international users are using their own Unicode words instead of the original names

the following example from
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles...mming-Language

ChangeRingKeyword see throw
ChangeRingKeyword ok EndOfConditional


for x = 1 to 10
        for y = 1 to 10
                throw "x=" + x + " y=" + y + nl
                if x = 3 and y = 5
                        exit 2     # exit from 2 loops
                EndOfConditional
        next
next

but its first index is 1 (like thinbasic arrays)

[Chris Boss]

This interest me a lot.

If one embeds ThinBasic (core) into an application would this be allowed for a commercial app ?

I am working on a development tool for a company which manufactures a Motor controller module. The Motor controller supports its own internal Basic like scripting language. It also sports an external ASCII command set which can be sent to it via USB. I created a secondary external min-scripting engine for quickly writing scripts which use that ASCI command set.

Now there are two ways which I could use ThinBasic.

(1) Write a module for ThinBasic which can use this scripting engine to talk to the motor controller.

(2) Embed ThinBasic into my development app and add commands to ThinBasic to use my scripting language so one could write code using ThinBasic language and have special commands which can send ASCII commands to the motor controller directly or send a prewritten script (program) to my mini-script engine.

My mini-script engine has a callback system so I can monitor the execution of ASCII commands to the motor control in realtime. My mini-script engine automatically opens the connection to the motor control (via USB or RS-485 serial) and sends the ASCII commands one at a time, tracks fail states and when it finishes a script disconnects the motor controller.

Would any of the above be doable with ThinBasic ?

Would it be permitted (based on your license) ?

[ErosOlmi]

Ciao Chris,

you are free to embed thinBasic Core engine (thinCore.dll) into any number of commercial program you want without any limitation.
You can also use any thinBasic module as well as far as it is not a module wrapper of a commercial library. In this case you need to purchase a valid license from the commercial library manufacturer.

For example thinBasic_LibXL.dll is a not yet documented wrapper of some few functions of LIBXL library https://www.libxl.com/
I developed this wrapper module for thinBasic to be used in the company I work for, and my company purchased the library license.
Then you need to call LibXL_book_SetKey(hBook, "{name}", "{key}") module function to pass license data from script to library in order to remove LIBXL limitations.

That said, I think the most efficient way to have a scripting language is to embed thinBasic Core engine into you program and execute scripts inside you application.
You will be able to wrap your internal functions to new keyword to be used in your script.
Only limitation is that you will be able to execute just one script at a time. thinBasic Core engine is not multi-threading script engine.

If you need help, please open a new post and I will be happy to show some PowerBasic examples on how to embed thinBasic Core engine and add new keywords.

Ciao
Eros