New thinBasic slogan

[ErosOlmi]

Demanding? Who is demanding?
It was my choice

[SeptiCaf]

What criteria do you consider when selecting a new slogan, and do you have plans for future updates or changes based on user feedback?

[ErosOlmi]

So ... your first post in thinBasic forum is related to resume a 15 years old post?

[ReneMiner]

Let it be THICKBASIC, or BASIC FAT XXL.
the only basic interpreter - still maintained after 20 years -capable of doing more things than the tools where it was created with - and no one would be angry when actually the 64bit-self-compiling pseudo-interpreter is under construction - everyone knows that thickbasic 2.0 will be better, and nothing will be lost forever in the past- it will be able to launch and run current thinbasic-core-module code, in x86-compatibility mode it will even be possible to run stuff thats based on the Win32Api
.
I just wonder what assembler you will use and it would not surprise me when it were the currently as thinbasic-module integrated o2 would provide the base for a basic-language that doesn't care about old fashioned rules as "a basic language is either compiled or interpreted".

What if the interpreter works on the rule to do whatever it needs to get a task completed with the best of possible results, were able to select often used function-parts from a library of pre-compiled routines and decides to compile a function just in time - when it's advantageous to combine it, appears to be needed and the highest possible amount of knowledge is available or when the required parameters are present.

Multi-threaded of course - when preparsing leads to the conclusion that a function should be compiled- drop the facts at he compiler and have it getting busy that the function - build with these situation-specific parameters is ready when the parser has finished the look-around-phase.

15 year old survey, i laugh myself to death, why does it have sooo many options to choose from?