Marcel,
your suggestion is exactly what we would like to implement. We do not want to rebuild any COM model but let thinBasic engine understand what user wants using a dot notation. I suggested to have a new variable type called OBJCT because the first element in the dotted notation must be a pointer to a COM interface. Having a DWORD to store such a pointer will not let engine understand that script is dealing with a COM interface already referenced.
Currently the biggest problem is that COM module is a separated module developed in C while thinBasic core engine is written is Power Basic so we need to understand what is better to do.
Ciao
Eros
Bookmarks