Sounds good to me.
Hi all,
I will prepair sticky topic with latest TopDown download soon.
My idea is to take krytons "planet" version as latest, and call it 0.5.0.0.
All other versions will have increasing numbers, while final ( if something like "final" is possible, hard to stop adding features ) will be numbered 1.0.0.0 ( or simply 1.0 ).
Future "Down and Dirty" would be 2.0.0.0 ( 2.0 ).
What do you think ?
Thanks,
Petr
Learn 3D graphics with ThinBASIC, learn TBGL!
Windows 10 64bit - Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.1GHz - 16 GB RAM - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
Sounds good to me.
I don't know why so many numbers are used in the version numbers. I think it makes it harder to read and see the latest version. My opinion of course.
I think just simpler numbering using 1 or 2 numbers, like v1 or v1.0 for release product.
development projects: alpha 1 or alpha 1.0 then beta 1 or beta 1.0
Alpha, Beta and V also sorts it nicely in the folders by name properly
Acer Notebook: Win 10 Home 64 Bit, Core i7-4702MQ @ 2.2Ghz, 12 GB RAM, nVidia GTX 760M and Intel HD 4600
Raspberry Pi 3: Raspbian OS use for Home Samba Server and Test HTTP Server
Thanks for opinion guys,
but now I am even more puzzled than before
kryton is right 4 digits is too much for a game...
So maybe go the Catventure way of Alpha + number, and when released full, only patched versions will have decimal part ?
Bye,
Petr
Learn 3D graphics with ThinBASIC, learn TBGL!
Windows 10 64bit - Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.1GHz - 16 GB RAM - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
yes, take this.
I am glad to know I am not strange in wanting little and simple numbering. I just think if Microsoft could do their naming this way it must be ok. Windows 3.0, Windows 3.11 and then VB 3, 4, 5 etc. Just easy to see right away and know what is the latest
Acer Notebook: Win 10 Home 64 Bit, Core i7-4702MQ @ 2.2Ghz, 12 GB RAM, nVidia GTX 760M and Intel HD 4600
Raspberry Pi 3: Raspbian OS use for Home Samba Server and Test HTTP Server
Bookmarks