PDA

View Full Version : Practical Guide to Free-Energy Devices



Charles Pegge
06-09-2013, 12:48
Intriguing devices, detailed descriptions:



The Law of Conservation of Energy is generally thought to be correct when it states that more energy cannot be taken out of any system than is put into that system. However, that does not mean that wecannot get more energy out of a system than we put into it. A crude example is a solar panel in sunlight. We get electrical power out of the panel but we do not put the sunlight into the panel - the sunlight arrives on its own. This example is simple as we can see the sunlight reaching the solar panel. In passing, it might be remarked that the "Law" of Conservation of Energy has recently been proved to be wrong, however, it wouldn't bother me at all if it were actually right as it assumes a "closed system" which is something that does not exist anywhere in the universe.


http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/

Petr Schreiber
06-09-2013, 14:38
Thanks Charles,

very interesting reading.


Petr

kryton9
15-09-2013, 04:50
Lots of links to follow in the coming months, thanks Charles.

Here is a documentary from a few years back, incredible stories... unfortunately could only find this low resolution version in full, so recommend watching in small size and not fullscreen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqCfDwJuiyo

AdamJacobs
17-10-2013, 19:46
Intriguing devices, detailed descriptions:



The Law of Conservation of Energy is generally thought to be correct when it states that more energy cannot be taken out of any system than is put into that system. However, that does not mean that wecannot get more energy out of a system than we put into it. A crude example is a solar panel (http://www.shinesolar.net) in sunlight. We get electrical power out of the panel but we do not put the sunlight into the panel - the sunlight arrives on its own. This example is simple as we can see the sunlight reaching the solar panel. In passing, it might be remarked that the "Law" of Conservation of Energy has recently been proved to be wrong, however, it wouldn't bother me at all if it were actually right as it assumes a "closed system" which is something that does not exist anywhere in the universe.l/[/URL]

Thanks for sharing information.. SO much to learn about these intriguing devices