View Full Version : David Wilcock
danbaron
15-01-2012, 08:39
2012-01-13
FINANCIAL TYRANNY: Defeating the Greatest Cover-Up of All Time:
http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1023-financial-tyranny
People lie, but numbers don't, well at least I hope that is the case. But when you look at the trillions he is talking about and then look at how fast our President is going through trillions in just 4 years and now wants an additional trillion, this sort of adds lots of credence to the story in my book. Everything seems to be coming to a head, best to put all of this aside and focus on coding, something we have control over and keep our minds out of the craziness out there.
Charles Pegge
15-01-2012, 15:34
A remarkable piece of work, coherently assembled in such a short time. Too late now to put a contract on DW!
I was just wondering whether it would be a good idea to start a vegetable garden, buy a few hens, and maybe acquire some fishing skills.
:)
Charles
...I was just wondering whether it would be a good idea to start a vegetable garden, buy a few hens, and maybe acquire some fishing skills...
They are saying that you would need to survive anywhere from 2 to 7 years of very hard times. Living in shelters underground with stored supplies before you could get above ground again to plant and have animals. That is if some sort of solar phenomenon or asteroid impact. Others say buy land in stable mountainous regions and form alliances with neighbors or even small communities with communal shelters and supplies.
If you are thinking a minor event then chickens, goats and sheep would be a good idea as well as some good guard dogs.
danbaron
02-02-2012, 07:51
I have the impression that there is something strange about this guy.
An example (below), from this link.
http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1023-financial-tyranny?start=5
"The first time I heard about this system was in 2007. I went to a meeting of movers and shakers from the entertainment industry at a private residence in Malibu, and was particularly impressed by one individual who wanted to start a concert to promote world peace.
I approached this person at the event and let him know who I was, and the film I was working on. We had some written and telephone exchanges after that.
Somehow, I was fortunate enough to have him and his partner invite me to their next meeting with their financier.
The meeting took place at the Casa Del Mar, a posh hotel / restaurant with valet parking on the waterfront of Santa Monica. (http://www.hotelcasadelmar.com/) Everything inside was very high ceilings, Victorian furniture and decor, and affluent-looking people.
The menu was competitively priced with most other restaurants in the area, which surprised me.
http://www.divinecosmos.com/images/image/Jennifer-Garner9.jpg
I saw Jennifer Garner, the actress, sitting at a neighboring table when I went into the main area to order food. We made eye contact but I did not bother her.
We also saw the CEO of a major Internet corporation arrive with two stunning Asian women in matching bikinis -- one white and one yellow -- both of whom had the same hair, the same sunglasses and the same gigantic breasts.
http://www.divinecosmos.com/images/image/ai-shinozaki.jpg
This is the closest matching picture I could find, regarding the way they both looked and the bikini style they had on -- except for the color, and the fact that they were both wearing sunglasses.
Imagine seeing two women looking this amazing on either arm of this gray haired man -- walking proudly through the middle of this posh restaurant!
Well, there I was... but things were about to get even more interesting."
I wonder, is his intention to write a movie script?
Does he think we are interested in all of his minute details?
It does get you to read and get into the rest of the story, which is something pretty interesting. It does match something on the video I linked to yesterday that in Hollywood very few movies make a real profit, and from what is in your article, it doesn't matter for this system.
Charles Pegge
17-02-2012, 22:42
Reuters Article:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/17/us-usa-bonds-forgery-idUSTRE81G11620120217 (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/17/us-usa-bonds-forgery-idUSTRE81G11620120217)
BBC Video:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17076378
danbaron
18-02-2012, 00:47
I have to admit, that I don't understand it.
I guess it supports some of what David Wilcock has said - he talks about fraudulent amounts in the trillions, and then this, a fraudulent amount in the trillions.
Probably this is a stupid question, but, did the guys expect to go up to the window in a Swiss bank, and for the teller to give them six trillion dollars in cash?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Say, I have genuine U.S. bond for one quintillion dollars.
Do you think I would be able to enforce a proclamation, giving all Americans 30 days to remove themselves from my property (the 50 states)?
At some point, what is legal doesn't matter at all, right?
Actually, you see it all of the time, with respect to wars.
Then, legality is in the eye of the beholder, correct?
Another example; why are there such great fights over Supreme Court nominations, if the law is within light years of being objective?
To me, in actuality, the law is mostly not more than a means for a small group to exercise power over everyone else.
And, usually, lawyers reflect that proclivity.
danbaron
18-02-2012, 01:20
Where there's smoke, there's fire?
Here's more smoke.
Yohannes Riyadi, who I never heard of, has 36 trillion dollars in a bank?
(It's funny what Blackheath says about the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, --> "Celebrity Big Brother".)
In his speech to Parliament, Blackheath calls out Alan Greenspan and Timothy Geithner.
(Obama made Geithner his treasury secretary. What does that say about Obama? Birds of a feather?)
Here is everything David Wilcock has been talking about, trillions and trillions of dollars, and, tons and tonnes of gold.
To me, it is almost impossible to understand all of the machinations, which, I think most likely means, it is all about unbelievable corruption.
Let's see if we hear even a peep about this from the mainstream American media.
If we don't, what does it likely indicate?
I'll say again, from the article, at least for me, this story is impossible to understand.
(Who knows?, maybe transparency is making some progress.)
http://the2012scenario.com/2012/02/house-of-lords-uk-parliment-lord-james-of-blackheath-speaks-of-money-laundering-rogue-us-government-dept-extraordinary-fraud/
danbaron
29-03-2012, 07:04
Here's the latest from David Wilcock.
I'm not convinced, he is, "playing with a full deck".
But, you decide.
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1035-divineintervention1
danbaron
29-03-2012, 08:05
"The UFO cover-up has been a key part of this insider world all along. Modern computer technology is only one of many tools we have reverse-engineered from this "celestial endowment" of deliberately crashed discs.
If events like Roswell hadn't happened, we may not have developed computer technology at all. Thankfully, we now have the full power of the Internet as we move through the great prophetic year of 2012."
"Talking through his hat" ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENIAC
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/talk_through_one's_hat (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/talk_through_one%27s_hat)
Maybe his audience is mostly comprised of dimwits, so, he is emboldened to believe in his own omniscience.
(Which kind of discs is he talking about? :p )
----------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's just me, but, for some reason when I read David Wilcock, I become irritated.
I wonder, do people think "reverse-engineering" a complex machine is easy?
In my opinion, if you don't understand the science which the technology implements, the task is approximately impossible.
Say, one of our desktop computers was transported back in time to the most advanced laboratory in the world, in the year 1850.
Do you think that the computer revolution would have begun in the 1870s, instead of the 1970s?
I tend to doubt it.
----------------------------------------------------------------
"In her radio interview with Greg Szymanski, (http://svalispeaks.com/?p=135) Svali revealed that all members are forced to endure human sacrifice rituals that are conducted in the Vatican -- in a secret subterranean chamber, accessed by a door hidden behind a giant painting."
I have to admit, I'm skeptical.
Dan
Say, one of our desktop computers was transported back in time to the most advanced laboratory in the world, in the year 1850. Do you think that the computer revolution would have begun in the 1870s, instead of the 1970s?
I tend to doubt it
i thought of this many times before, that suppose every technology have disappeared suddenly from all the world except my apartment. also every techno knowledge have evaporated from the minds of all people except me.
can i make a difference ??. i know about electricity and that it is generated by moving a wire near a magnet so i will teach the people that. but what about a computer componenet, i know nothing real, it is a product of (many many many)^3 areas of knowlege so i will not be able to teach about comupter making. but i will teach about the diode, transistor, but not how to make it. what about metal works, nothing. what about big airplanes, nothing, rockets, just some toys. steam
engine, how to make the cylinder and the piston, seems impossible task.
what about satellites, absolutely nothing . i will teach about theories of expanding universe. i will make batteries frome lemon, copper,zink.
in general may be i will transfer the world to the 1700 from a prehistoric era. the currenct knowlege are too complex to be manipulated by one person, it is like an ant community in which there is a job to every member.
PS: i thought more about generating electricity from a wire, but how to make the thin wire, so i may transfer the prehistoric world to near the year 1000 but with a lot of toys. may be i will seed the knowledge to speed its advancement by the available books.
danbaron
30-03-2012, 10:15
I don't know how to make the thin wire.
My guess is that somehow the metal is "drawn" (stretched).
I think you can make small metal spheres by dropping the melted metal through the air.
Surface tension causes the liquid metal to form a spherical shape while it is falling.
The air also cools the metal, and if the fall is far enough, it becomes solid before if hits the ground.
What would we need to make a computer chip? - hammer, nails, wood, saw, drill, sandpaper, paint, what else?
Charles Pegge
31-03-2012, 18:37
If you lose all your technology, it's a long way back! You must learn how to build shelter, light fires, find safe things to eat, then make friends with horses and dogs to assist you...
With regard to David Wilcock's writing (and Benjamin Fulford's for that matter), I see no harm in treating it as entirely fantasy, though there are a quite a few verifiable realities in the mix somewhere.
I think the strongest testimony comes from retired military personnel.
Charles
danbaron
15-04-2012, 06:24
David Wilcock seems like some combination of scammer and crazy to me.
http://www.thinbasic.com/community/newreply.php?p=86524&noquote=1 (http://www.thinbasic.com/community/newreply.php?p=86524&noquote=1)
7867
ddDavid Wilcock - Nuts?
tt(Would you call what he is wearing,
tttta shirt, or, a costume?)
danbaron
02-05-2012, 07:22
Although I think David Wilcock views himself as a superhero, I'm also convinced the world power structure is completely different than we have been propagandized from birth to believe.
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1051-g7banks
danbaron
11-05-2012, 20:46
http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1054-divineintervention