a symbol of madness

[zak]

http://img4.imageshack.us/i/idiotk.png/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P88FAtAhbcY
a symbol of psychopathy, severe mental illness, how can this creature a leader for more than 42 years!!, he is not elected by the lybia nation, he forced himself using an army power in the biggest mistake in history.
he is now killing his people while the world are watching,
the only good job this creature can do is an actor in a horror movie such as saw, and he will enjoy that.
now his dismissed justice minister said that he who ordered exploding the airplanes in europe .
the unarmed people needs help, how can a bare hand stand in front of a gun, absurd.
and he does not belong to islam or any religion more than a donkey related to a books he may hold.
look at the picture he hold on his chest, why not someone suggested to him to attach an advertisment for a product such as milk or cola!
realy there must a way the UN to accept a leader in UN, the first is to pass an oral and written exam in front of the UN secretary, and proadcasting it on Air.
second he must attend a course in GWbasic to learn some logic.
after that he will be given a certificate that he can do his job as a president.

what are you waiting for, the world, watching a mad man killing the innocent people ?????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[danbaron]

Hi zak, I like that, Gadhafi giving a speech and saying that he will kill everyone, while simultaneously holding up an advertisement for Coca-Cola. Capitalism must always be primary, yes?!

I read an article today (link below) about a disgusting American CIA agent in Pakistan, who recently killed two people there, and was apprehended. The top American politicians are furious that the Pakistani government will not release him. They don't feel the slightest bits of embarrassment, guilt, or shame (my guess is that they are incapable of those feelings). I sent an email to the author of the article. Below, is part of what it said, I think it applies to Gadhafi - although beyond that, I think Gadhafi is also, just a plain lunatic, who is ready and willing to take everyone with him, if he is going, "down".

Dan

http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney02242011.html

-------------------------------------------------------------

The variation in people is almost unbelievable, isn't it?

Some people are amazingly awful.

I can't understand people who are totally, "false".

I think I can understand someone, who is bad, and doesn't try to hide it.

But, it is close to being beyond my ability, to understand people who are terrible, and who do all they can to hide it.

Those people, in my opinion, are extraordinary.

I guess for them, the only priority is getting what they want, and, they are ready, willing, and able to portray themselves in any way which facilitates that.

(A U.S. politician without sympathy or empathy, who is power driven, must feign those qualities to be successful, at least presently, yes?)

I guess my theory is that some of the seemingly benign successful American politicians, would be tyrants given the correct circumstances (the tyrant in Bush was always near the surface, correct?).

I can only think that they are close to being absolute narcissists.

It seems to me that their emotional and moral developments must have stopped when they were very young (Bush?!, Sarah Palin?!).

I think that internally they must be like two year olds, no matter how intellectually intelligent they may be (not Bush, not Sarah Palin).

I also think that, "birds of a feather flock together".

Every person is naturally attracted to other people who are like himself/herself, correct?

I think that often people don't realize why they have the friends they do, but, I bet in most cases friends are fundamentally similar to each other.

So, I would expect that Obama and Clinton would comprise a mutual admiration society.

I would expect the same for Kissinger, Cheney, and say, Brzezinski.

I have been around some people in academics, who I observed and (subjectively) classified as narcissists.

I noticed that around others similar in temperament and rank, they act as "admiration mirrors", compliments continually bounce back and forth.

The other group which they like to be around, are those lower in status, who fawn over them.

It seems paradoxical to me that narcissists would need admiration from those who (whom?) they disdain, but, apparently they do (maybe subconsciously they loathe themselves).

It seems to me that at the top of almost any large organization, are to be found, lots of narcissists, malignant narcissists, and psychopaths.

But, I guess those at the extreme end of the spectrum might have difficulty in sufficiently hiding their true selves, and preventing public exposure.

The other strange thing I speculate about narcissistic personalities, is that many of them have little or no notion that they are emotionally defective.

No person can in any way measure how he/she feels against how someone else feels, right?

Maybe in the future, there will be empirical tests for emotional and moral deficiencies, and the affected will be prevented from occupying positions of authority.

But, most likely not in our lifetimes, am I correct?