View Full Version : Thunderbolts of the Gods
Charles Pegge
11-04-2010, 17:57
The Electric Universe
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374#
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Q4fecFbYBg
Petr Schreiber
11-04-2010, 19:19
Charles,
as usually, very interesting source of information.
I am not very strong in physics, to say it mildly, but I still found it fascinating.
I liked the part about sun spots, and it was something new to me to see the jets on comet and I also never knew about the experiment of colliding object with comet.
So ... thanks!,
Petr
Charles Pegge
11-04-2010, 19:49
This is radical stuff that will put many cosmologists out of business if it proves to be correct.
Charles Pegge
12-04-2010, 00:53
Black holes tear logic apart
http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=tyybhrr8
Charles Pegge
23-05-2012, 23:07
Review:
Dec 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4zixnWeE8A&feature=related
This was terrific; a real eye-opener. It makes a lot of sense.
I intend to read up on plasma physics.
Charles Pegge
25-05-2012, 09:50
If this theory is true then we will have to live without black holes, neutron stars and dark matter, and scrap all the Tokomak fusion projects.
No big bang, no expanding universe either. The red shift/doppler effect cannot be relied upon as a measure of distance.
danbaron
25-05-2012, 21:20
I can't watch the videos, so, I am mainly ignorant, but, from the posts, I like the theory.
I don't like the ideas of the big bang and the expanding universe.
I mean, emotionally, I don't like them.
And, if you can't determine distances using the red shift, what a "monkey wrench" that would throw into the gears of astronomical physics.
How could you know how far away a star is?
I guess you could still use triangulation for stars that are relatively close.
Say, at 12:00:00 AM GMT on January 1st, from a particular observatory, you measure the angle to a partcular star.
Then, at 12:00:00 AM GMT on July 1st, from the same observatory, you do it again.
On the other hand, wouldn't at least 99% of people who know who he is, be extremely skeptical that Stephen Hawking could have been wrong, for instance, concerning his, I believe, massive work on black holes?
In fact, who would believe he was wrong even in his belief that black holes exist?
(Of course, I think I remember a time when he was convinced that "the theory of everything" was visible on the horizon.)
Charles Pegge
25-05-2012, 22:21
Galactic filaments
Some amazing images showing the interconnectness of galaxies:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=hp&biw=886&bih=733&q=galactic+filaments&gbv=2&oq=galactic+filaments&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&gs_l=img.3..0.3107.16749.0.19485.18.11.0.7.0.0.88.866.11.11.0...0.0.dQ0FhlpNyB0
Occasionally, apparently adjacent galaxies, connected by a filament have very different red shifts.